Most forums try to prove their impact by getting bigger. RSG Taipei 2026 did the opposite: 221 senior executives attended, with a 9.27 overall satisfaction score and an NPS of 71 (-100 to +100) — earned not by chasing free registrations, but by 31 volunteers running a month of self-managed collaboration, and 20 business leaders who committed NT$400,000 in trust before the event even took shape. Afterward, Scrum Alliance published an official feature on this Taiwan forum, and Canada's agile community reached out for an exchange of its own. It turns out letting the world see Taiwan was never about throwing the biggest event — it was about building one that international peers actually wanted to learn from. If you're wondering where your own organization should start building a decision room like this, that's exactly what I do every day, coaching CSM and CSPO cohorts inside companies.

多數論壇辦得越大，越證明不了改變。RSG Taipei 2026反其道而行：221位高階主管出席、整體滿意度9.27分、NPS 71 (-100 ~+100)，不是靠免費衝人數換來的，而是31位志工用一個月自管理協作、20位企業領導者提前投入新台幣40萬信任金換來的。活動結束後，Scrum Alliance在官網以專文報導這場台灣論壇，加拿大的敏捷社群也主動邀約交流——原來讓世界看見台灣，不是辦一場最大的活動，而是辦一場連國際同行都想借鏡的活動。如果你也想知道，你的組織要從哪裡開始建立這樣的決策現場，這正是我陪跑CSM、CSPO企業專班時，每天在做的事。